What are the three main claims of cognitive dissonance theory

The idea is, choosing something that is in opposition to how you feel or believe in will increase cognitive dissonance. Moreover, integration of cognitive dissonance and current CBT models of OCD (Aardema & Wong, 2020; Doron & Kyrios, 2005; Doron et al., 2007) can organize a variety of findings and theoretical concepts in a coherent and unified way. In cognitive dissonance addiction conclusion, considering dissonance theory and the self-affirmation perspective in conjunction with contemporary CBT models of OCD may enhance psychological understanding and generate interesting implications for cognitive-behavioral conceptualization and treatment of OCD. Consistency in behavior is something humans also strive for (Festinger, 1957).

Download 3 Free Positive CBT Exercises (PDF)

What are the three main claims of cognitive dissonance theory

In fact, recent research has suggested that while a discrepancy between cognitions drives individuals to crave attitude-consistent information, the experience of negative emotions drives individuals to avoid counter attitudinal information. In other words, it is the psychological discomfort that activates selective exposure as a dissonance-reduction strategy. This definition of meat-animal dissociation shares similarities with, and is facilitated by, other constructs and processes. Bastian and Loughnan (2017) convincingly argued that people rarely consciously reflect on the moral implications of eating meat because societal mechanisms keep people’s cognitive dissonance in place. People often partake in rituals and traditions without reflecting on their rationale or consequences.

Eating meat

What are the three main claims of cognitive dissonance theory

Only participants in a condition involving high dissonance (expenditure of effort via exercise and choice in this type of effort) showed weight improvement relative to comparison conditions involving different approaches to weight control. When Festinger (1957) proposed cognitive dissonance theory, the behaviorist perspective and reinforcement theory (e.g., Skinner 1938) were influential in how theorists thought about human behavior. According to the behaviorist perspective, people are motivated to hold particular attitudes and behave in certain ways to gain positive reinforcement and avoid punishment. As such, a person would be more likely to have a positive attitude toward…

Control of: behavior, information, thought, emotion

Imagine confronting a sunbather with the information that excessive sun exposure is the leading cause of skin cancer. The two thoughts – ‘sunbathing can cause cancer’ and ‘I am sunbathing’ – will cause the discomfort of cognitive dissonance. Cognitive dissonance can be caused by feeling forced to do something, learning new information, or when faced with a decision between two similar choices. Cognitive dissonance theory aims to explain the relationships between the motivation, perceptions and cognitions of an individual.

What are the three main claims of cognitive dissonance theory

Changing Behavior

Individualism is discouraged and putting “God” or the group first is the norm (in this case, “God” often proves to be the leader). Prohibited or censured thoughts, feelings and activities (of self or others) must be reported to superiors. Where people live and with whom they can live is highly significant, because members of destructive cults violate the human right of free association by ordering or shaming members into ostracizing, shunning or disconnecting from non-believers. Festinger, [2–4] in his ground-breaking Cognitive Dissonance Theory described how beliefs have a cognitive, an affective, and a behavioral component. In his study and his book [3,4], Festinger infiltrated students into a UFO cult.

What are the three main claims of cognitive dissonance theory

Download 3 Free Positive Psychology Tools Pack (PDF)